My Reply to Clinton

August 2016

 

Dear Ms. Clinton,

I received the election materials you sent sans my request and thought it appropriate I respond sans yours.

Since you took the time to use some of your foreign aid monies to have the materials printed and to send it via one of your underpaid (no $ 15.00 minimum in your camp) underlings to mail it, I thought it only fair I read and respond.

I must say, what I read was an incredibly well-written amalgam misrepresentations, fabrications, and deliberate deceptions designed to deceive the reader into thinking you mentally capable of leading the United States of America.

You lead an effective attack against your opponent, Mr. Trump by denigrating his indelicateness, his lack of political acumen and most importantly, to you at least, the beauty of his wife. You call him crass and vulgar for speaking his mind while you, in turn, live a fictional life where the truth is as fleeting as your youth.

What you do not do is prove to me that I can trust you enough even to allow you back in our White House, let alone the Oval Office.

Mr. Trump will be as different a president as were Reagan, Eisenhower and Washington, all men who led a nation with little or no political experience. They had a real vision, substantial followings and most importantly the will to stand against the establishment to make America Great.

You, Ms. Clinton, would be a president for a policy based on your predecessor’s failures and your own personal distorted reality. Your decisions would be centered on the demands of your foreign puppeteers. Your mistakes would be blamed on your enemies and if that didn’t work, on your employees, underlings child, and grandchildren.

I disagree with Mr. Trump’s assessment of you being “the Devil”. I refuse to give you that much talent. I think you are nothing more, nor less than a gold digging, political hack with a Fascist mentality. I believe you have sold your soul to the Devil who, as is fair, is going to collect when you lose the election, if not before.

Your history of treacheries is finally catching up with you. Hopefully, you will remain alive long enough to be arrested, tried, convicted, sentenced and sent to prison there to ponder the insanity of you.

 

PapaNyk

What would a Clinton presidency mean to me?

When I was born, FDR was president – wow, long time ago. I wasn’t able to vote yet, but that’s ok I couldn’t feed myself either – my mother did it.

Now that  I’m 72 years, and quite able to feed myself, but I am being force fed political garbage from all directions by wannabe presidents.

For the record, I’m not a Democrat nor Republican, Socialist, Fascist, Communist nor any other organized political movement, I am an American. An American, who has had a rough life lived from paycheck to paycheck and had to survive on the mean streets for a time. I’ve also dined with a  diplomat and had pizza with street whores. I eke out an existence on Social Security and what additional money I can earn and I work hard when I have to. My car is paid off, my bills aren’t. I started college at age 70 because I wanted to and there was FREE FINANCIAL AID FOR ME TOO.

I’ve had my successes, and I’ve had my failures – I’m an American.

Now, why do I write this? It’s simple, I’m an American, and I enjoy Freedom of Speech, and I want that to continue. I firmly believe that a Clinton presidency will eventually deny me that right. I think it has already begun with the removal and barring of the Sanders followers from the DNC. Silence dissent and you silence Freedom of Speech.

Yes, both conventions silenced some dissent. The Republicans by removing individuals from the arena, the Democrats by building walls to prevent them getting in.

What, to me at least is dissent and Freedom of Speech?

I believe my being able to have a different opinion about a topic is a dissenting opinion. We all have some about something now and then. It’s how we handle our belief that can turn dissent into violence. It’s how we verbalize our disagreement that may cause strife.

In watching TV talk shows and interviews as I make my voting decision I have noticed that almost to a person, the Democrat speakers like to overspeak their counterparts. Geraldo Rivera and Juan Williams on FOX are prime examples. They appear to want to deny others the opportunity to voice their opinions on a topic by using the techniques of overspeak and interrupting. When this is accompanied by violence, as in the demonstrations at the various speaking engagements of Trump, it is no longer dissension, it is organized terrorism directed at Freedom of Speech.

We now know that many of the “protesters” at the various Trump speeches were hired, thugs.

We now know that BLM receives funding from outside sources, probably from the Billionaire Soros, and/or the Clinton Foundation.

We now know that the Black Panthers receive funding from outside sources, possibly from Billionaire Soros and/or the Clinton Foundation.

 

So what is my summation of my comments?

I believe that the Democrats are dead set on ending Freedom of Speech.

I think they already control the Freedom of Speech claimed by the major television networks.

I know if they remain in office, they will eventually completely shut down Freedom of Speech and dissension to begin the era of Big Brother.

I believe the Democrat party of today is the most deceitful and corrupt it has ever been.

I know it has to be defeated both from without and within.